Am I any less of a believer because I don't look to the Bible to be the scientifically verifiable, mathematical precise truth? In other words, I am not a literalist.
Did Balaam's ass really talk? Did the sun really stand still for Joshua? Did Jesus really walk on water?
I hold open the possibility. That is my faith. Do I need these to be scientifically, verifiably true?
No.
But of course that opens up other questions: did Jesus really rise from the dead? If so, in what sense? Spiritually? Physically?
Yes.
I believe the claims that it happened according to the Bible. What that means through the lens of my post-enlightenment, post-modern mind is a different story.
It does, however, open up my mind to deeper levels of understanding of the human condition and our purpose on earth. It burrows deep into the soul, beyond the joints and marrow, to quote Hebrews 4:12. It gets in there.
The Bible is a book of community experience, of representative humanity, each book, each chapter, each person a "type" of each of us. We see ourselves, in various situations, in various characters, and it is through their lives as story we begin to see Truth. Truth, in this sense, comes through the pages of the Bible.
If we quote a verse that somehow quoting it means something, we miss the point, as if a mere quote of a verse proves something. It is the application of it that is important, the Word buried in our heart, transforming us into the likeness of He who inspired it. We become the living word. We, in this sense, become the Bible.
The Bible, as it stands, without application, is just a book.
The question remains: Would it be any less true if Jesus didn't walk on water?
Corbin and Tabataba’i
1 week ago
No comments:
Post a Comment